Friday, May 22, 2009

DeMoss on Prejean

I've held off commenting on this story, but here's something worth reading. It's Nancy Leigh DeMoss on Carrie Prejean:
Carrie has made a strong public profession of her faith in Christ. As Christians, we are called to live as redeemed men and women and to reflect to the world the beauty and holiness of God. I’m not in a position to judge Carrie’s motives or her heart. But while I applaud her courage, I also believe some of her choices and public actions, past and present, are representative of many women who consider themselves Christians, but who lack clear biblical thinking and conviction on such matters as virtue, womanhood, beauty, modesty, and discretion.

In my mind, Carrie Prejean’s story is symptomatic of deeper root issues in the evangelical world—issues that in my opinion outweigh most of what is being debated in the secular press.

Sadly, Carrie is the product of a Christian sub-culture that has lost a sense of what it means to be citizens of the kingdom of God and has embraced the values and thinking of this world.

By and large, young adults who have grown up in our evangelical homes, churches, and schools, are buying into a message that they have seen modeled by those around them who call themselves Christians—namely, that Christianity can be divorced from Christ-likeness, and that practical holiness in everyday life is out-dated, irrelevant, or optional.

If you don't know what this is about or want to read more, click here for all her comments.

On the same subject (Prejean), but a totally different topic (First Amendment rights), here's Chuck Colson. I have to say though, that when we're left defending our right to free speech instead of debating the issue of homosexuality, the battle for the definition of marriage in the US has been lost. Thankfully, the real war is already decided.

No comments: